Remarks on Singapore Sultanate according to "Malay Annals"Catatan Kesultanan Singapura Mengikut periwayat Melayu "Malay Annals"
From the writer of Malay history, we have two types of history writers, one that follow "Malay Annals" and the other one were based on the author of "Bustanu's Salatin", Nuru'ddin Raniri Al-Hasanji, one of Malay Book of history that tells many story about Singapore Sultanate and it's relations with the Melaka Sultanate system.
The differences between those two writers are, that the Singapore Sultanate by Malay annals has Five(5) kings, while in BUstanu's Salatin has only three(3) but both tell us that it has direct relation to Melaka Sultanate system, only that Paduka Seri Pekerma Diraja(1st Melaka Sultan, Parameswara still were not rrecognised in Bustanu's Salatin, but the Singapore Sultanate system continue directly into Melaka Sultanate system.
From the story, a bright boy kill by the king and Singapore were attack by king fish, Singapore has been hit by a very bad curse, haunted and was deserted for very long time. almost three decades.
Dari periwayat sejarah Melayu dahulu, terdapat dua jenis periwayat, satu adalah berdasarkan periwayat umum(Malay Annals) dan satu lagi adalah dari periwayat Nuru'ddin Raniri Al-Hasanji, pengarang "Bustanu's-Salatin", salah satu kitab sejarah Melayu yang banyak menceritakan sejarah Kesultanan Singapura dan perkaitan dengan Kesultanan Melayu Melaka.
Perbandingan antara kedua adalah dalam periwayat umum(Malay annals) menyatakan bahawa Kesultanan Melayu Sungapura mempunyai lima(5) Raja, sementara dalam "Bustanul Salatin" hanya Raja ketiga(3) dan mempunyai pertalian terus dengan Kesultanan Melaka, cuma Paduka Seri Pekerma Diraja atau Parameswara(Sultan Muhammad Shah) sahaja belum diiktiraf sebagai Sultan Melaka yang pertama), namun perkaitan kedua-duanya menjurus kepada Kesultanan Singapura berterusan kepada Kesultanan Melayu Melaka.
Akibat dari cerita Singapura mengenai budak pintar dibunuh kerana ditakuti melawan raja hingga cerita dilanggar todak, Singapura seolah-olah terkena sumpahan, ianya ditinggalkan dan kawasan itu dikatakan berhantu.
....."
The differences between those two writers are, that the Singapore Sultanate by Malay annals has Five(5) kings, while in BUstanu's Salatin has only three(3) but both tell us that it has direct relation to Melaka Sultanate system, only that Paduka Seri Pekerma Diraja(1st Melaka Sultan, Parameswara still were not rrecognised in Bustanu's Salatin, but the Singapore Sultanate system continue directly into Melaka Sultanate system.
From the story, a bright boy kill by the king and Singapore were attack by king fish, Singapore has been hit by a very bad curse, haunted and was deserted for very long time. almost three decades.
Dari periwayat sejarah Melayu dahulu, terdapat dua jenis periwayat, satu adalah berdasarkan periwayat umum(Malay Annals) dan satu lagi adalah dari periwayat Nuru'ddin Raniri Al-Hasanji, pengarang "Bustanu's-Salatin", salah satu kitab sejarah Melayu yang banyak menceritakan sejarah Kesultanan Singapura dan perkaitan dengan Kesultanan Melayu Melaka.
Perbandingan antara kedua adalah dalam periwayat umum(Malay annals) menyatakan bahawa Kesultanan Melayu Sungapura mempunyai lima(5) Raja, sementara dalam "Bustanul Salatin" hanya Raja ketiga(3) dan mempunyai pertalian terus dengan Kesultanan Melaka, cuma Paduka Seri Pekerma Diraja atau Parameswara(Sultan Muhammad Shah) sahaja belum diiktiraf sebagai Sultan Melaka yang pertama), namun perkaitan kedua-duanya menjurus kepada Kesultanan Singapura berterusan kepada Kesultanan Melayu Melaka.
Akibat dari cerita Singapura mengenai budak pintar dibunuh kerana ditakuti melawan raja hingga cerita dilanggar todak, Singapura seolah-olah terkena sumpahan, ianya ditinggalkan dan kawasan itu dikatakan berhantu.
....."
No comments:
Post a Comment